Contrast if you direct the identical post to an average slice of people

Yes, but also no. It's entirely feasible to promote or suppress behavior via algorithmic options, and at this point these sites know that. Emotional investment generates"involvement", so that's what's centered on.

By directing aggressive posts into an audience that can get riled up, upvote, and respond using their own, it provides Pavlovian reinforcement and normalizes the behavior... while continuing to drive up screen time.

Contrast if you direct the identical post to an average slice of people, in which case it is more likely to get downvoted and advised to become a racist jerk. At which point the user is sad and leaves, but normally does the behavior less.Eh, there's absolutely debate about how those fancy fonts may be hell for b/vi folks because screenreaders/text-to-speech programs struggle with them 'Fifi' in that font would be read as'scientific correspondence , scientific correspondence , scientific correspondence , scientific correspondence I' and if you've got your entire bio as that font it'd get old really quickly.

If you want to know more about AC, you can visit https://www.acbells.com/